Basics of Synthesizers (9) – PCM Synthezisers (Pulse Code Modulation)

Hello! This is Jooyoung Kim, a mixing engineer and music producer.

Today marks the final article in my ‘Basics of Synthesizers’ series. I may add more articles in the future if I come across interesting topics, such as modular synthesizers (which I’ve recently started exploring—stay tuned!). For now, however, I feel I’ve covered enough to complete this category.

Let’s start!


The PCM (Pulse-Code Modulation) method is essentially a form of digital sampling that represents analog signals through discrete digital steps. While modern virtual instruments load massive recorded data into RAM to trigger sounds via MIDI, hardware PCM instruments utilize ROM in much the same way—storing high-quality, pre-fabricated waveforms that are ready to be played instantly.

Because these instruments play back pre-recorded samples from internal memory rather than synthesizing them from scratch or recording new ones, they are commonly called Romplers (a blend of ROM and Sampler). Unlike pure samplers, Romplers focus on the immediate reproduction of realistic acoustic and electronic sounds, making them the backbone of music production since the late 1980s.

Implementing such a system requires significant computational power and memory resources. Thanks to rapid technological advancements, these requirements were finally met in the late 1980s. During this period, ROM prices decreased significantly, allowing for the emergence of instruments installed with long-cycle samples, which offered a level of realism previously unattainable.

The Kurzweil K250 was the forerunner and the first PCM-based synthesizer.

These instruments utilized samples of each sound phase—attack, decay, and release. This approach allowed them to produce more realistic and dynamic sounds. Many people requested authentic sounds and in the 1990s, these kinds of instruments became mainstream.

The PCM method is now the standard for recording systems, DAWs, and virtual instruments. You might assume that modern virtual instruments are simply evolved versions of PCM-style synthesizers, and that is largely true. However, as many musicians today find themselves missing the characteristically thin and lo-fi sounds of vintage PCM hardware, many software companies now provide these classic instruments in digital formats.


The Korg M1

The Korg M1 was a famous PCM-style synthesizer in the late 1980s. It became one of the best-selling synthesizers in history. Its specific presets, such as the M1 Piano and Organ 2, defined the sound of 1990s house and dance music. These sounds were so distinct that they are still widely used in modern electronic music productions.

The M1 also featured external card slots, allowing users to expand its sound library by inserting PCM and Program cards, providing additional waveforms and presets beyond its internal memory.


The E-mu Proteus Series

The E-mu Proteus series were also famous PCM-style synthesizers in the late 1980s. Unlike the Korg M1, they were rack-mount module swithout a keyboard. they were designed to provide high-quality samples at a lower price point, making them standards in many project studios. Their presets were widely used in film and television scores, including the iconic whistling sound in The X-Files theme.

The later models of the Proteus series were also highly expandable; they featured internal slots where users could install additional ROM SIMMs, such as the Orbit or Mo Phatt cards, to instantly add hundreds of new sounds tailored to specific genres.


The Roland JV-1080 and JV Series

In this perspective, you should know about the Roland JV series. The JV-1080 and 2080 are legendary icons of the Rompler era. Released in the mid-1990s, these units became industry standards, found in almost every professional studio worldwide. Their massive success came from their ability to provide high-quality, ready-to-use PCM samples through various expansion boards, allowing musicians to access realistic orchestral, synth, and ethnic sounds instantly without the need for complex sampling.

This picture shows sound expansion slots of the JV-1080 synthesizer

You can hear the sounds of the official Roland Cloud recreation of the JV-1080 in this video, as demonstrated by ADL-MusicLab. It’s easy to associate these sounds with 1990s and 2000s classic pop, TV commercial soundtracks, and film scores.


The Korg Trinity and Korg Triton

The Korg Trinity and Triton were also iconic instruments of that era. Beyond hip-hop, these workstations defined the sound of mainstream pop. For instance, The Neptunes were among the most famous users of the Triton, while the instrument’s distinctive patches were also featured in many of Britney Spears’ hits. These units weren’t just for one genre; they were the great tools for producing the global hits of the early 2000s.

Similar to the JV series, the Triton also offered expandability through EXB-PCM boards and even allowed for the addition of the MOSS synthesis engine.


The Yamaha Motif

The Yamaha Motif was another famous instrument of the era. It produced more realistic sounds than its competitors, so its Acoustic Piano, Rhodes (E. Piano), and Acoustic Guitar presets were widely used in churches. In particular, it became a standard keyboard for global worship teams like Hillsong and Bethel, defining the sound of modern gospel music. The Motif stood out for its PLG expansion boards, which allowed users to add entirely new synthesis engines, such as FM synthesis, directly into the unit. (In South Korea, the Motif is still widely used in worship services.)


Interestingly, the thin and lo-fi quality of these sounds has become a source of classic pops. If you want to recreate an authentic vintage pop vibe, I highly recommend exploring these types of virtual instruments.

With this, I would like to conclude my ‘Basics of Synthesizers’ series. I have put a lot of effort into researching and explaining these concepts, and I hope you found them helpful.

Thank you for reading, and I will see you in the next article!

I bought microKORG XL (older version) and Bolanle passive stereo DI box

Hello! This is Jooyoung Kim, a mixing engineer and music producer.

Recently, I bought a small portable synthesizer: the microKORG XL. KORG currently sells the microKORG XL+, but this discontinued version has a very reasonable price on the used market (just about $140 in Korea!), and its sounds are still perfectly usable.

The keys are made of cheap plastic. However, I can connect an external controller via a MIDI cable or transmit MIDI data via a USB cable.

It also has an external audio input, such as a microphone or line input, which can be used for the vocoder function.

There are two kinds of outputs, unbalanced L/R and headphones, which are very convenient to use.

The synth has 8 categories/genres and 2 selectable banks. Therefore, a total of 8 X 8 X 2 = 128 preset programs are available.

But I’m really disappointed by the microKORG XL editor software provided by KORG. It’s no longer usable, and I cannot even install the program on my Mac system.

Also, I have microphone preamps but no DI box. So, I decided to purchase a stereo DI box. However, you might realize I’m not an affluent musician if you’ve been following my posts. After some web searching, I found a cheap DI box made by Bolanle (just $33!) being sold on Aliexpress.

I really didn’t have high expectations for this gear because of its price, but surprisingly, the build quality is great!

I can’t say I love all of the sound presets on the microKORG XL. However, I am particularly fond of one lead sound preset and one keyboard sound preset. The vocoder function is quite valuable as well.

Now I am eager to get a full analog multi-voice synthesizer. Music making always drains my wallet!

That’s all for today. See you in the next post!

Basics of Synthesizers (7) – Granular Synthesis

g

Hi! This is Jooyoung Kim, a mixing engineer and music producer. Today, I’ll introduce granular synthesis, which is composed of “grain” units.

The principle of this type of sound synthesis is very similar to the concept of sampling. Granular synthesizers take small parts of a sample and store them as units. Those units are called “grains.” That is where the name “Granular Synthesis” comes from.

The grains have lengths ranging from approximately 1 to 100 ms, and these samples can be played at different times, phases, speeds, and frequencies in a granular synthesizer. Thus, cloudy sounds that resemble long reverberations and continuous tails are produced by these manipulations.

In 1947, Dennis Gabor introduced this concept, which was first implemented in a computer in 1974 by Curtis Roads, an electronic music composer specializing in granular and pulsar synthesis. The spans are quite long, aren’t they?

The emergence of granular synthesizer hardware was significantly delayed due to the large computational requirements and high CPU speed needed for the calculations. Thus, the real-time version of this synthesizer emerged 12 years after the use of granular synthesizers in Curtis Roads’ music.

The real-time granular synthesis was invented by Barry Truax, a Canadian composer. This synthesis was processed by the DMX-1000 computer.

Naturally, you might wonder about the existence of physical hardware, as with other synthesizers. The upper photo shows the modern, dedicated granular synthesizer hardware, the GR-1, which was released in 2017.

This shows that this kind of synthesis processing requires a lot of computing resources. And this means that many virtual synthesizers using this method require significant computing power.

However, for implementation in DAWs (Digital Audio Workstations), no physical hardware is needed to use granular synthesis. Arturia’s EFX Fragments is a great example.

Output’s “Portal” plugin is another excellent granular effect.

This is the official video of the EFX Fragments. You might hear the “shimmering sound” from it.

This sound could be effective in ambient music that requires long tails on the sounds. I like these sounds, but I’ve never used them in my music… ^^;; However, someday I will…

OK, I’ll wrap this up today. See you in the next post!

Basics of Synthesizers (4) – Modulation Synthesis and FM (Frequency Modulation)

Hello, I’m Jooyoung Kim, a sound engineer and music producer.

In my last post, I talked about my thesis, but here’s a funny update: the journal that desk-rejected my paper (Transactions on Consumer Electronics) sent me an email asking me to be a reviewer. It’s a bit of a niche SCIE journal, but still Q1-Q2 level, so I was pretty floored. I’m flattered, but since I haven’t even graduated with my master’s yet and my main paper isn’t published, I politely declined. Who am I to judge someone else’s work at this stage? 😅

Now, let’s get to today’s topic: picking up where my synthesizer series left off last month, we’re diving into modulation synthesis, focusing on the legendary FM (Frequency Modulation) synthesis, made famous by the Yamaha DX7.

Here we go!

Modulation

What is modulation? I touched on this in my Basics of Mixing series a while back:

In short, modulation involves using an external signal (the modulator) to alter specific parameters of another signal (the carrier), changing its sound. The external signal is often a Low Frequency Oscillator (LFO), but other sources can be used too.

Types of Modulation

TypeDescription
AM (Amplitude Modulation)Modulates the amplitude of the carrier signal using a modulator. Think tremolo effects.
FM (Frequency Modulation)Modulates the frequency of the carrier signal. Famous for metallic and bell-like sounds, as heard in the Yamaha DX7.
PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)Modulates the pulse width of a square wave. Common in analog synths and compressors like the PYE Compressor. [photo]
RM (Ring Modulation)Multiplies the carrier and modulator signals, producing only the sum and difference frequencies (a+b, a-b).
PM (Phase Modulation)Modulates the phase of the carrier signal. Fun fact: the DX7 is technically PM-based but was marketed as FM for mass appeal.

AM and FM might sound familiar from radio broadcasting. FM, in particular, shines in synths for creating those iconic metallic or bell-like tones. There are also other modulation types like Cross Modulation, Wavetable Modulation, and Granular Modulation, but I’ll cover those in their respective sections later. 😄

FM (Frequency Modulation)

Dr. John Chowning

Meet Dr. John Chowning, the mastermind behind FM synthesis, developed in the late 1960s at Stanford University. [photo] FM synthesis modulates the carrier’s frequency with a modulator, producing complex, irregular harmonics that are perfect for metallic and bell-like sounds.

Yamaha’s YM2612 chip

FM synthesis was a staple in 1990s video games and software. Yamaha’s YM2612 chip (aka OPN2) powered sound cards like AdLib and Sound Blaster, as well as consoles like Sega’s Mega Drive and Fujitsu’s FM Towns Marty.

In 1971, Dr. Chowning saw the commercial potential of FM synthesis and pitched it to companies like Hammond and Wurlitzer, but they all passed. Yamaha, however, struck a deal, securing a one-year license and exclusive rights to the technology by 1975. Looking at its massive success, both Yamaha and Dr. Chowning had incredible foresight! 😊

Yamaha GS-1

In 1980, Yamaha released the GS-1, their first FM synthesizer, with only 16 units made for studio use. It was used by legends like Stevie Wonder, Chick Corea, Herbie Hancock, and Toto.

Priced at $16,000 back then—about $66,000 today, or roughly 1 billion KRW—it was a luxury item.

Yamaha GS-2

The GS-1’s unique sound was a hit, leading Yamaha to release the more portable and affordable GS-2, as well as the CE-20 and CE-25 Ensemble series for the home organ market.

Yamaha CE-20
Yamaha CE-25

Yamaha’s PAMS and DX Series

Yamaha later developed the PAMS (Programmable Algorithmic Music Synthesizer), which offered flexible programming but had too many parameters.

To simplify, Yamaha’s engineers made the modulator and carrier envelope generators share parameters, leading to the DX series: DX-1 (73-key flagship), DX-5 (76-key, budget version of DX-1), DX-7 (6-operator), and DX-9 (4-operator).

The Yamaha DX7 is arguably the most iconic FM synthesizer, selling 200,000 units worldwide at 248,000 yen each—a massive commercial success.

It featured six sine wave operators that could act as either carriers or modulators, with 32 selectable sound algorithms to switch their roles. In the diagrams, each vertical line represents a sound synthesis path, with parallel lines combining, the bottom being the carrier, and those above it modulators.

The DX7 also supported MIDI, often paired with sequencers like the Yamaha QX-1. Beyond bell-like sounds, it’s famous for electric piano (FM EP) and bass (FM Bass) patches—search for those terms, and you’ll find tons of resources. 😄

In one sentence: FM synthesizers excel at creating sounds with irregular harmonics.

Modern FM Synths
Some great virtual instruments carry the DX7’s FM legacy:

If you buy through these links, I earn a small commission, which helps me keep going—thank you! That said, I recommend waiting for bundle sales to grab these at a better price. I previously covered Arturia’s V Collection X bundle, which is worth checking out:

Don’t just take my word for it—try a free virtual synth, play around, and hear the sounds for yourself!

That’s it for today. See you in the next post! 😊